www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ralph Goers <Ralph.Go...@dslextreme.com>
Subject Re: JavaCC generated parser for Harmony...
Date Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:37:53 GMT
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On 6/26/07, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't see any license headers in the generated artifacts.
> That sounds to me to be too easy. If anything is a "derived work",
> then it's surely the result of a parser generator. In other words, I
> doubt that we can dissolve the license of the grammar from the license
> of the parser generator result.
I guess I would disagree, although I certainly could be wrong. While the 
parser generator may have its own license, I would think the grammar 
being processed would be owned by whoever created it and could be under 
whatever license is desired. The output of the parser generator would 
seem to me to be more a derivative of the grammar than the generator.

How is this really different than the Java (or any other language's) 
compiler? The source code is owned by the author and the binaries are 
also the author's. The processing used to convert the source to the 
binary isn't really in the picture. It is just a tool which you have to 
have the appropriate license to use that converts the source into 
another format.


DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message