www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lawrence Rosen" <lro...@rosenlaw.com>
Subject RE: Comments on GPLv3
Date Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:01:30 GMT
Martin van den Berndt wrote:
> Aggregation != collective work afaik (although I still need to study the
> license in detail)..

In what ways do you think they are different? To some extent you are right,
because one can aggregate in a non-copyrightable way such as by simple
alphabetizing or by arranging a collection in chronological order. (The
phone book is a classic example.) There isn't enough expressive content in
such simple collections to turn the aggregation itself into a collective
work for copyright purposes. But other than for that technical reason, I
don't understand why you think that GPLv3's term "aggregation" isn't what
copyright law refers to as a "collective work."


DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message