On Mar 12, 2007, at 4:19 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> * or switch to another license that would satisfy both (L)GPL and
> Apache downstream users. If I understand correctly, a revised BSD
> license [1], [2] satisfies this requirement, so it looks like the
> best bet.
Still fighting that Monday caffeine deficiency :-)
Here is the links to [1] and [2]:
[1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#TOCOrigBSD
[2] http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
Andrus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
|