On Mar 14, 2007, at 9:58 PM, Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> On the other hand, sometimes due diligence people like to create
> checklists of licensed software - so maybe if the notice file pointed
> out the preferred / etc license of Apache while also listing the other
> options available it would serve both needs?
It makes no difference legally, but we can always say something like
"This ASF redistribution of Mozilla Rhino is consistent with the terms
of the MPL 1.1 license."
....Roy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
|