www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henri Yandell" <bay...@apache.org>
Subject Re: CMr - Plug-in engine discussion on javalobby!
Date Wed, 14 Mar 2007 02:27:44 GMT
On 3/12/07, Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> On 3/11/07, Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org> wrote:
> > The reasoning is wrong. After discussion with the FSF, the ASF were
> > happy that depending on LGPL jars did not invoke any form of
> > reciprocalness, so there was no license issue to stop us using LGPL
> > code and/or distributing it.
> That doesn't match my recollection at all: IIRC, it was that the FSF
> was not willing to issue any clarifications regarding LGPL and Java.
> Do you have a pointer to this discussion?  -- justin

My recollection of what Cliff reported back from his conversations with them.

When I say 'the ASF' above, I mean 'the Legal VP'. The bit you're
referring to is the set of conversations before then (I think).


DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message