www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jean T. Anderson" <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Crypto: Apache product that includes an Apache product that includes crypto interfaces
Date Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:57:05 GMT
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> On 2/22/07, Jean T. Anderson <jta@apache.org> wrote:
>> ...
>> Now, perhaps stating the obvious, if an Apache project supports Derby
>> (i.e., can use it) but does not include Derby source or jars, it doesn't
>> have to do the BIS notification. Unlike the OpenSSL case of not
>> including source or binaries [1] Derby just uses standard JDBC for the
>> "bindings", there are no Derby-specific bindings a product would have to
>> provide.
> Correct.  It would get really ugly if that wasn't the case.
>> I'm anticipating the next faq and thought I'd get the authoritative
>> answer up front.
> If you feel a desire ;-) to write such an faq to clarify this (that
> would maybe follow [1]?) and send it to this list, I'll deal with the
> publishing.

I sure will -- thanks for the help.


>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html#faq-linkedtolibssl
>> "If my project ships a binary that provides bindings to OpenSSL, but
>> does not include its source or binaries, what notifications must be
>> made?"

DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message