www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Diephouse <...@envoisolutions.com>
Subject Re: Generated Sources in SVN
Date Sun, 05 Nov 2006 19:32:59 GMT
robert burrell donkin wrote:

>On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 15:20 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote:
>  
>
>>Punts upwards to a more clueful tier of support - Geir/Cliff?
>>
>>On 10/31/06, Dan Diephouse <dan@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>Can anyone from legal confirm whether or not sources which were
>>>generated and checked into SVN need to have an Apache license header? In
>>>our case someone has downloaded a schema [1], generated beans, checked
>>>them into SVN and  left the schema only on their local machine (no
>>>longer needed).
>>>      
>>>
>
>FWIW i tell people that generated documents do not require headers. AIUI
>it's the sources which are important from the copyright perspective. be
>good to know whether this is right or not then add something to the
>legal FAQ...
>
>- robert
>  
>
This stance makes sense to me. Based on my limited legal knowledge, 
they're generated so there is no one who owns the copyright, unless we 
have a policy of going around and collecting CLAs from programs which I 
don't know about....  :-)

- Dan

-- 
Dan Diephouse
(616) 971-2053
Envoi Solutions LLC
http://netzooid.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message