www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Derby and the JCP
Date Fri, 04 Aug 2006 21:01:23 GMT

Rick Hillegas wrote:
> In the next month, Derby plans to generate a new feature release called
> 10.2. The Derby community is confused about a possible conflict between
> the Apache 2.0 license and the JCP.
> When run on J2SE 1,3, 1.4, or 1.5 there is no problem.
> However, when run on Java SE 6, Derby 10.2 will expose JDBC drivers
> which implement an early-draft of the JDBC4 spec, governed by JSR 221:
> http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=221. The proposed final draft of
> that spec may be found at
> http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/pfd/jsr221/index.html. Item
> (3) in the NOTICE section of that draft requires that Derby ship with
> the following notice. It is this notice which may conflict with the
> Apache 2.0 license:
> "This is an application written to interoperate
> with an early-draft specification developed under the
> Java Community Process (JCP) and is made available for
> testing and evaluation purposes only. The code is not
> compatible with any specification of the JCP."
> We need your guidance:
> 1) Does this notice conflict with the Apache 2.0 license?

yes. People can do whatever they want with Apache licensed code,
including run it in production, making a product, etc.

This doesn't get us out of the derby-javadb-mustang-jdbc4 jam.

The agreement we came to was that the spec would be proposed under a
license that allowed distribution with a marking that it's non-final.
I'm happy to argue for that - there's no harm in telling users it's an
implementation of an un-ratified spec, but not place any limits on use.

> 2) In particular, does this notice conflict with the AS IS clause of the
> Apache 2.0 license?

To this untrained, non-lawyer, yes.


DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message