www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Libbrecht <p...@apache.org>
Subject Re: JCP spec licensing (was RE: StAX (JSR 173) API source license)
Date Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:25:33 GMT
Dittert, Eric wrote:
> The licensing of a JCP specification does have conditions placed on it
> by the JSPA (http://www.jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/JSPA2.pdf).
> IANAL, but it appears to me that AL2 does not meet those conditions.  It is probably
not fair to blame Jonathan for insisting that those
> conditions be adhered to.
My opinion as "consumer" of these specs, or at least the source code of 
their APIs : I dare say that if this is true the whole JCP and its 
outcomes is something I should take more time to mistrust.

I hope strongly to have this cleared in favor of an Apache Public 
License possible licensing which, I thought, Sun was politically 
somewhat supportive of (they have more and more Open-source corporate 

Actually, wasn't JAXP donated to ASF ? (e.g. see [1])
Would it also be constrained by such ?



DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message