www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org>
Subject Re: OT; openssl ponders gpl compatibility, BSD advert clause
Date Sat, 15 Apr 2006 03:13:38 GMT
On Saturday 15 April 2006 07:27, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> At the same time, the current GPLv3
> drafts has almost identical patent languages to what's currently in
> the ALv2.  Hence, I believe the ball is in the FSF's court rather than
> ours.

Out of curiosity...

Does that mean GPLv2 projects can not depend on GPLv3 licensed material??

If so, interesting situtation. :o)
If not, then how does the language between ALv2 and GPLv3 vary to allow for 
this?


Cheers
Niclas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message