www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanj...@opensource.lk>
Subject Re: [Request For Comment] Third-Party Licensing Policy
Date Sat, 18 Mar 2006 00:09:59 GMT
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 16:38 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Some of us in the ASF, from the BSD crowd to users like myself from a Windows
> background, always percieved this as a principle, even if it's a second tier
> priciple behind community and collaborative code.
> If we percieved differently, we wouldn't be here, we would be elsewhere in the
> GNU umbrella or elsewhere.  We wouldn't have fought to create a portability
> runtime under the ASL, because there is the NSPR and other code to do that.
> We (speaking for myself and some unquantified subset of the developers) built
> APR precisely so it could be used anywhere.
> APR serves no 'users', it serves developers who build software on top of it.
> I think the entire 'we serve users' is sort of silly, as you keep qualifying it
> with 'end users'.  When working in APR-space, end-users are the furthest thing
> from my mind, they shouldn't even be aware of 'some library' when httpd, svn
> and other consuming projects do their job right in configuration, detection and
> packaging :)

Big +1 from me .. the fact that ASF produces software under the Apache
License is effectively a principle for me as most of what I do in ASF is
far from end users too.

Cliff I will give my feedback next week.


DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message