www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
Subject Re: What kind of oversight Is required for a release?
Date Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:41:53 GMT
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> I do not believe that this is a relative matter.  As I understand it, the
> requirement is for PMC votes, and projects that don't do that are misguided
> and not in accord with the ASF's structure.  Committers have no standing in
> our bylaws; only PMC members have standing.  Which is one reason why Roy has
> said that any Committer who is not a PMC member should be asking why not,
> and wanting to be.

So why don't we just merge the concept of Committer and PMC member? If
Committers should be PMC members, why not just change our processes so
this is always the case?


DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not 
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions 
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for 
official ASF policies and documents. 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message