www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From j.@jmason.org (Justin Mason)
Subject Re: What kind of oversight Is required for a release?
Date Mon, 14 Nov 2005 19:41:20 GMT
Hash: SHA1

Cliff Schmidt writes:
>On 11/13/05, Issac Goldstand <margol@beamartyr.net> wrote:
>> Garrett Rooney wrote:
>> > On 11/13/05, Cliff Schmidt <cliffschmidt@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Section 6.3 of the ASF bylaws
>> >> (http://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html) establishes PMCs for
>> >> "the creation or maintenance of "open-source" software for
>> >> distribution to the public at no charge".  The officer primarily
>> >> responsible for the PMC may "establish rules and procedures for the
>> >> day to day management of project(s) for which the committee is
>> >> responsible."  It is these rules that govern the specific way that the
>> >> project creates an open and meritocratic environment, which includes
>> >> the process of committers voting for things affecting the project.
>> >> However, it is always the PMC (and more specifically, the PMC chair,
>> >> as the ASF officer) that is responsible for the actions of the
>> >> project.
>> >>
>> >> Since official ASF distributions are pretty significant (especially
>> >> due to the need to ensure there are no open legal issues), the PMC
>> >> should not lazily delegate this action to the members of its
>> >> community.  Of course, they should put a lot of weight on the desires
>> >> of the community, including users, contributors, and committers; but,
>> >> the PMC is ultimately responsible for the entire project and must make
>> >> the final decision.
>> >>
>> >
>> > So what you're saying is that while other people can vote, they're
>> > only expressing an opinion, and those votes really can't count towards
>> > the 3 required for a release, right?
>> >
>> That's not what I thought I read - I saw "there is no standard set of
>> rules, the PMC members (and ultimately, the PMC chair) of each project
>> are free to come up with a set of rules for their own project, so long
>> as they realize that ultimately, it is their responsibility to ensure
>> release compliance with ASF standards".
>I'd say, ask your PMC chair.  If *you are a PMC chair* and think it is
>fine for committers on your project to release distributions on behalf
>of the ASF without three +1 votes from PMC members, I would suggest
>you make sure the board doesn't have a problem with that.  I can only
>tell you that the Beehive, Incubator, and XMLBeans releases require
>PMC votes, not certain about the other ~30 projects.

Well... SpamAssassin does not require PMC votes, just 3 +1's from
committers -- http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/VotingProcedure .
So make that 29.

http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes does not suggest
that we need to ask the board for permission to use that model.  Perhaps
it needs updating ;)

- --j.
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS


DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not 
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions 
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for 
official ASF policies and documents. 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message