www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: "nuclear facility" clausule in Sun license is compatible?
Date Fri, 09 Sep 2005 16:18:16 GMT
On 09/09/05, Antonio Gallardo <antonio@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi sebb:
> 
> Thanks for your answer!
> 
> sebb wrote:
> 
> >On 09/09/05, Antonio Gallardo <antonio@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi folks,
> >>
> >>This license is basically BSD compatible. The only difference seems to
> >>be the lastest paragraph that seems to impose a restriction. I will like
> >>to know if this license should be considered as an Apache License
> >>compatible license or not.
> >>
> >>Thanks in advance.
> >>
> >>Best Regards,
> >>
> >>Antonio Gallardo.
> >>
> >>Here is the full license text:
> >>
> >>
> >
> >[snip]
> >
> >
> >
> >>- Redistribution in binary form must reproduct the above
> >>
> >>
> >
> >"reproduct" ??
> >
> >
> Yep. I just did a "copy&paste". The word is part of the license. I

Just shows that bugs are everywhere ...

> cannot find the word in english dictionary:
> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=reproduct
>
> IANAL. I believe they mean something like: reproduced:
> 
> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=reproduced
> 

Or "reproduce".

> Best Regards,
> 
> Antonio Gallardo.
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message