Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91575 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2005 21:27:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Aug 2005 21:27:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 70123 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2005 21:27:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 69966 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2005 21:27:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 69953 invoked by uid 99); 4 Aug 2005 21:27:31 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 14:27:31 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [134.134.136.19] (HELO orsfmr005.jf.intel.com) (134.134.136.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 14:27:20 -0700 Received: from orsfmr100.jf.intel.com (orsfmr100.jf.intel.com [10.7.209.16]) by orsfmr005.jf.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.1 2004/09/17 17:50:56 root Exp $) with ESMTP id j74LRQN8008142; Thu, 4 Aug 2005 21:27:26 GMT Received: from orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com (orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com [192.168.65.206]) by orsfmr100.jf.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.2 2004/09/17 18:05:01 root Exp $) with SMTP id j74LR3Ck030602; Thu, 4 Aug 2005 21:27:24 GMT Received: from orsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.56]) by orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.7.47) with SMTP id M2005080414272322087 ; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 14:27:23 -0700 Received: from orsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.207]) by orsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 14:27:24 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: ASL Only Distribution Policy [was Apache's LGPL Policy] Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 14:27:22 -0700 Message-ID: <59278FC0C48A994BABABD069571E45680BA7BAD1@orsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: ASL Only Distribution Policy [was Apache's LGPL Policy] Thread-Index: AcWZKaTr76QhXVolTvyKa5wvy0mA0QAA2RmQ From: "Dittert, Eric" To: "Dan Diephouse" , "Justin Erenkrantz" Cc: "Jeffrey Thompson" , "Cliff Schmidt" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Aug 2005 21:27:24.0000 (UTC) FILETIME=[4DF5C600:01C5993B] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:dan@envoisolutions.com] Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 12:21 PM > >I think its ok that the derivitive definition varies between licenses. >Thats why we define things.=20 > Dan - Essentially, I think you are right that what it comes down to is that the definitions or interpretations (implicit or explicit) in the two licenses are different. The situation is confused by the fact that in the definitions sections of these licenses, the term "derivative work" is not listed as a defined term. Worse yet, each of the licenses in their definitions uses the phrase to "derivative work under copyright law", from which one *might* infer that when they say "derivative work" elsewhere in the document, they mean "derivative work under copyright law". And one *might* also expect that an organization's interpretation of "derivative work under copyright law" would not vary between licenses. Jeff, I think, was just saying, well, gee, if FSF's interpretation of copyright law for the GPL makes source code that refers to a library a "derivative work" of the library, then wouldn't their interpretation of copyright law still be the same in the LGPL? -- Eric --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org