www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Apache's LGPL Policy
Date Thu, 04 Aug 2005 15:08:58 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 
> Huh?  AFAIK, there are no 'absolute' httpd/apr dependencies on lgpl.
> There is an option in apr to bind to gpl/lgpl db stores, and an option
> to utilize the gpl iconv library.  Both are absolutely optional; I'm
> hoping this is what you were refering to.
> 

This may have already be said, so apologies all around if so.

Let's say that APR had a dependency on gdbm (ie: we didn't include our
sdbm impl and provided no method for other *dbms to be used). Thus,
APR would be worthless without gdbm.

A situation such as this would not be allowed.
-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
                     "Sith happens"  -  Yoda

---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message