Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38091 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2005 07:10:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2005 07:10:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 70037 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2005 07:10:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 69854 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2005 07:10:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 69826 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2005 07:10:20 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:10:20 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [134.96.188.26] (HELO mail.dfki.de) (134.96.188.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:10:16 -0700 Received: from mail.dfki.de (localhost.dfki.uni-sb.de [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEFCE4818; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:10:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (dave.dfki.uni-sb.de [134.96.184.220]) by mail.dfki.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5819FE47F5; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:10:13 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20050713151848.GA84909@mail26b.sbc-webhosting.com> References: <20050713151848.GA84909@mail26b.sbc-webhosting.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: From: Paul Libbrecht Subject: Re: Apache falls victim to OASIS patent shelter Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 23:18:05 +0200 To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Is this really "fall victim" or... "discovers the hole" (the legal one)=20= and thus saves the rest of the planet ? I honestly say that such fights are the proof that real open-source=20 software institutions have a lot of political impact on the rest of the=20= developers. Even though it might be GPL-compatible (I don't know), I don't expect=20 the FSF, CodeHaus, or any other open-source large body to actually take=20= over WS-security now that such a proof has been made... how wrong am i ? paul Le 13 juil. 05, =E0 21:18, Lawrence Rosen a =E9crit : > FYI.... /Larry Rosen > > http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=3D1591 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org