Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 5363 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2005 20:43:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2005 20:43:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 15274 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2005 20:43:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 15062 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2005 20:43:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 15048 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2005 20:43:26 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of costin@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.194 as permitted sender) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (HELO rproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:43:25 -0800 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 34so49158rns for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:43:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=eeHDDKvy5S3OAKWmKDWKm6lLCrhNJ+to9t4KjOfDVvGifghKH4qyIRlTlE8GgUjrKWdb+a2fdGzVDd/VqUqHAbhNJleqKeLirSiQN24N/kgktUahMil5PnXQ51OdALpY3HFfueEOb0wXgO2rHR9hvLhJ25V74K+HFesVVh8qHhs= Received: by 10.38.206.58 with SMTP id d58mr2911308rng; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:43:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.8.27 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:43:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <96e4b5230503251243799e732f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:43:23 -0800 From: Costin Manolache Reply-To: costin@apache.org To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Subject: Re: Corporate Contributions Cc: "Geir Magnusson Jr." , legal-discuss@apache.org In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.2.20050325022002.057d2320@pop3.rowe-clan.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <32D5845A745BFB429CBDBADA57CD41AF0E658606@ussjex01.amer.bea.com> <5736849C-9C94-11D9-BB99-000A95D41A40@apache.org> <1111704665.5118.75.camel@knossos.elmet> <7A30B344-9CC8-11D9-BB99-000A95D41A40@apache.org> <6.2.1.2.2.20050325022002.057d2320@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:25:06 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > That would have a significant adverse affect on a community, and could allow in certain circumstances, that employer to fork the project by licensing the employees work under a license we can't deal with, and letting the project continue under their control.... > > That employer could do so in any case. They retain their own > ownership and copyright even after granting rights to the ASF. > Is this the case (i.e. both ASF and the contributor have ownership of the code ) ? That's another piece of information where I heard conflicting stories, and more vetted information would be useful. Costin --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org