Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4229EEC5.7080502@apache.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 12:39:17 -0500
From: Sam Ruby <rubys@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Derby PPMC <derby-ppmc@incubator.apache.org>
CC: legal-discuss@apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about using CPL-licensed software
References: <4228EBEC.6080806@bristowhill.com>
 <26645680-8D0F-11D9-ACFB-000A95D41A40@apache.org>
 <4229E7CC.3000206@bristowhill.com> <4229EA09.9000003@debrunners.com>
In-Reply-To: <4229EA09.9000003@debrunners.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Daniel John Debrunner wrote:

> Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> 
>>Thanks, Geir,
>>
>>The "this is creating derivative works under the CPL, and  distributing
>>them from apache under the CPL, which we don't do." is perfectly clear.
> 
> CPL allows derivative works to be distributed under a different licence
> (section 3), ie. ASL v2 for Derby. Are the terms of the CPL for this
> type of redistribution in conflict with the ASL v2?

The CPL only allows Contributors (i.e., people who give back changes and 
additions) to distribute derivative works.

The ASL v2 does not have that requirement.

It is important to the ASF that people know that they don't have to 
further investigate as to which portions they must give back changes and 
which portions they have no such obligations.

- Sam Ruby


---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org