Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80637 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2005 16:38:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2005 16:38:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 10932 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2005 16:38:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 10778 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2005 16:38:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 6135 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2005 14:35:33 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) In-Reply-To: <200502162228.55060.niclas@hedhman.org> References: <200502162029.03437.niclas@hedhman.org> <200502162228.55060.niclas@hedhman.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: legal-discuss@apache.org From: Brian McCallister Subject: Re: Spec sources in Geronimo Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:35:27 -0500 To: Niclas Hedhman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N You might ask them for the "why worth the effort" as it was definately a huge effort. I have already found it to be wonderfully helpful as they are ASL 2.0 licensed, so no more SCSL click-throughs for other projects, which is great. I'm incredibly glad they did it, and buy beer for them whenever I bump into them, personally =) -Brian On Feb 16, 2005, at 9:28 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Wednesday 16 February 2005 21:38, Brian McCallister wrote: >> My understanding is that these are not Sun sources, they are >> interfaces >> and classes written by Geronimo folks specifically in order to avoid >> having to avoid being dependent on the SCSL sources Sun provides. > > Considering the amount of effort behind this, do you know what the > benefit is > supposed to be? > Do you know if they intend to ship alternative "API impls" (or > whatever you > should call it)? > > Hmmm.. I don't get it. :'( > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational > only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org