Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
From: Niclas Hedhman <niclas@hedhman.org>
To: legal-discuss@apache.org
Subject: Re: Reply-To on legal-discuss
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:40:56 +0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <4213B1C4.4080309@Golux.Com>
 <1108588102.9202.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>
 <20050216231213.P8703@bez.hyperreal.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050216231213.P8703@bez.hyperreal.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200502171840.56286.niclas@hedhman.org>

On Thursday 17 February 2005 15:13, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > I am opposed to changing this list to the kind of list that sets the
> > reply-to.
>
> As am I.  Despite the slight confusion recently that the discussion about
> the copyright attribution should have happened here, I would rather see
> the error condition be that messages that should have been public are
> accidentally made private, rather than the other way around.

And auto-responders can not be catched without the ReplyTo, and I have seen 
such stick around for months before someone does anything about it.

In any event, I have never seen any mailing list manage to change from one to 
the other, so I think this is a futile attempt.


Cheers
Niclas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org