Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83043 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2005 22:42:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2005 22:42:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 43084 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2005 22:41:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 42883 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2005 22:41:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 42870 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2005 22:41:58 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from www2.kc.aoindustries.com (HELO www2.kc.aoindustries.com) (65.77.211.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:41:57 -0800 Received: from www2.kc.aoindustries.com (www2.kc.aoindustries.com [65.77.211.84]) by www2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.12.9-20030917/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j1GMfsKI003399 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:41:55 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by www2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.12.9-20030917/8.12.9/Submit) id j1GMfs5k003361 for legal-discuss@apache.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:41:54 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: www2.kc.aoindustries.com: indexgeo set sender to crossley@apache.org using -f Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:41:44 +1100 From: David Crossley To: legal-discuss@apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Message-ID: <20050216224144.GA20331@igg.indexgeo.com.au> References: <4213B85F.3010102@Golux.Com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4213B85F.3010102@Golux.Com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > In time-honoured Apache fashion, I request that we decide > this issue with a vote. :-) -1 for the same reason as Fitz. Normally i would prefer the Reply-To to be set to the list because mailing list discussions should remain on the list. If people want to do private replies then they can figure it out or learn by their mistakes. However for this legal list, the risk is too great, so i will suffer the inconvenience. --David --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org