Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48407 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2005 21:28:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2005 21:28:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 5684 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2005 21:28:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 5494 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2005 21:28:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 5454 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2005 21:28:01 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com (HELO sanpietro.red-bean.com) (66.146.194.200) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:28:01 -0800 Received: from 10.3.0.97 (newton.ch.collab.net [66.146.194.194]) (authenticated bits=0) by sanpietro.red-bean.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5) with ESMTP id j1GLRusW015683 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:27:57 -0600 Subject: Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss From: "Brian W. Fitzpatrick" To: coar@apache.org Cc: legal-discuss@apache.org In-Reply-To: <4213B85F.3010102@Golux.Com> References: <4213B85F.3010102@Golux.Com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:27:59 -0600 Message-Id: <1108589279.9202.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.70, clamav-milter version 0.70j X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 16:17 -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: I'm -1 on adding reply-to to this list, *especially* because it's a legal discussion list, and the repercussions of someone accidentally sending a PRIVATE reply to the list are MUCH GREATER than the repercussions of someone accidentally sending a PUBLIC reply just to one person. -Fitz --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org