www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com>
Subject Fwd: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss
Date Thu, 17 Feb 2005 06:53:20 GMT
And, in fact, because of the missing reply-to, I have just sent this to Ken. :-)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:49:54 +0100
Subject: Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss
To: coar@apache.org

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:17:19 -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size
<Ken.Coar@golux.com> wrote:

> So I'll start it off: I'm +1 on adding Reply-To to this list.


My personal opinion is, that it doesn't really matter. However, as
most mailing lists *have* reply-to, it is what I am more used to and
what I personally am more ready to deal with.


Sum. Cogitone?

Sum. Cogitone?

DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message