www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss
Date Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:04:55 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -1, reasons below

Jason Hunter wrote:

> (Now posting to the official vote thread just in case votes aren't
counted in the branch.)
>
> --
> I agree with Fitz too. I especially don't like that it eats actual
Reply-To headers.

I was in the reply-to camp until I read these messages, and this document:

>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

Makes a lot of sense, and makes me wish we could go back before the
behaviour was learned :) Having recently used infra@ where the header is
not present with good reasons, I can say you learn very quickly.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCE9+nOb5RoQhMkRMRAhRJAJ9VIeCTiBondBczkTiiTP5NXhxoLACeMyCe
mw4vszRGQD326u8RXbM22Mg=
=DM3M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message