www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Licence required in javadoc output?
Date Thu, 03 Feb 2005 19:34:30 GMT
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

>On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 01:02:30AM +1300, Simon Kitching wrote:
>  
>
>>I also notice that the footer for this very web page has a *reference*
>>to the apache license rather than either 
>>a) nothing (which was the general conclusion of the email thread above),
>>or
>>b) the full license text.
>>    
>>
>
>Look at the source for the page: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html.
>It has the license as a comment at the very top of the HTML.  -- justin
>  
>
While there's obviously nothing wrong in doing that, that's not how I'd 
read the text though. It doesn't say that the license has to be in the 
resulting file when you transform the source file to HTML.

- Brett



---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message