www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niclas Hedhman <nic...@apache.org>
Subject Re: The reason I am against setting Reply-To (was Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss)
Date Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:45:09 GMT
On Thursday 17 February 2005 06:19, Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Based on the above example, I think that having the Reply-To set on a
> list can be a terribly dangerous thing to do--in one case the default
> annoys you, but in the other, the default can harm you.  It seems
> obvious to me that the default that can cause harm should never be the
> default.

IMHO, very weak argument; The default behaviour of a car going 100mph is to 
keep rolling and only very slowly decreasing the speed. If you don't take 
active action, away from the default, it *will* cause you great harm.


Cheers
Niclas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message