www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <bay...@generationjava.com>
Subject Re: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause".
Date Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:57:42 GMT

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 acoliver@apache.org wrote:

> I mostly want to stay away from this one (I'm here primarily for things that 
> might pertain to POI and various ASF stuff I use).  However, it does bring a 
> question.  Does this mean that the board is now willing to reconsider the 
> allowance to use LGPL stuff in ASF projects?

The answer here is yes (pending someone from the board telling me to shut 
up :) ). If we can agree on a hibernate-style exception, then in addition 
to the avenues of asking an LGPL'd project to dual-licence or re-licence, 
we can ask if they'd be prepared to apply the exception.

Still wouldn't allow us to choose to use any LGPL'd project, they'd have 
to include the exception somehow.

> Does this mean that the board 
> is now willing to allow LGPL binaries to be served from ASF servers?

I think the exception Brian posted would allow it, but I'm not sure where 
distributing LGPL stuff was left decision-wise. If no one else answers, 
I'll make sure to find out.

> If so will this change apply evenly to all projects?

I can't see why not.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message