www-jcp-open mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: OSGi CT access
Date Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:10:32 GMT
Makes sense to me.


Regards,
Alan

On Jan 19, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:

> I think that this is the right direction - that we should be as open  
> with the OSGi CT as we are allowed, and from what I understand, the  
> license is fairly open and pragmatic.
>
> We went the route we did for Sun's JCP stuff (lets be clear - our  
> BEA TCK license had no nonsense like Sun's tends to...) because we  
> had to, not because we wanted to.
>
> geir
>
> On Jan 19, 2010, at 1:46 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 19, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:23 AM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/19/10 10:11, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>>> I'd like to confirm the process for gaining access to the OSGi CT.
>>>>>
>>>>> An ASF committer can:
>>>>>
>>>>> * submit an NDA -- http://www.apache.org/jcp/ApacheNDA.pdf
>>>>> * send a request on jcp-open, presumably with an simple  
>>>>> explanation of why they would like access to the CT (e.g. I'm  
>>>>> working on the Apache Aries project and would like access to the  
>>>>> OSGi CT).
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that about right?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For me, this seems reasonable. I was looking to Geir to see if he  
>>>> agreed, since he has more experience with this than me.
>>>
>>> For CT work, would we need a separate mailing list?
>>
>> I think we're more protective of our TCK discussions than we need  
>> to be, but that's another matter...
>>
>> I believe we are free to discuss the OSGi CT openly. I believe our  
>> only restriction is that we cannot redistribute or create  
>> derivative works from the CT materials. Richard, Geir (or anyone  
>> else) alternative opinions?
>>
>> --kevan
>


Mime
View raw message