www-jcp-open mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: OSGi CT access
Date Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:12:24 GMT

On Jan 19, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Richard S. Hall wrote:

> On 1/19/10 13:46, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> On Jan 19, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:23 AM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 1/19/10 10:11, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to confirm the process for gaining access to the OSGi CT.
>>>>>
>>>>> An ASF committer can:
>>>>>
>>>>> * submit an NDA -- http://www.apache.org/jcp/ApacheNDA.pdf
>>>>> * send a request on jcp-open, presumably with an simple  
>>>>> explanation of why they would like access to the CT (e.g. I'm  
>>>>> working on the Apache Aries project and would like access to the  
>>>>> OSGi CT).
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that about right?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> For me, this seems reasonable. I was looking to Geir to see if he  
>>>> agreed, since he has more experience with this than me.
>>>>
>>> For CT work, would we need a separate mailing list?
>>>
>> I think we're more protective of our TCK discussions than we need  
>> to be, but that's another matter...
>>
>> I believe we are free to discuss the OSGi CT openly. I believe our  
>> only restriction is that we cannot redistribute or create  
>> derivative works from the CT materials. Richard, Geir (or anyone  
>> else) alternative opinions?
>>
>
> That is correct.
>
> But I assumed Alan's question was in regard to the fact that the  
> OSGi CT is not a JCP issue...to me, it seems ok to use this mailing  
> list for that too...or to just rename this mailing list to "open- 
> standard" or something...it doesn't seem like we need a bunch of  
> different lists.

Nope, it was concern about discussing the OSGi CT openly, something we  
are not allowed to do for JSR TCKs.


Regards,
Alan


Mime
View raw message