Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jcp-open-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77442 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2009 09:48:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jun 2009 09:48:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 9172 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2009 09:48:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jcp-open-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 9011 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2009 09:48:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jcp-open-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: jcp-open@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list jcp-open@apache.org Received: (qmail 9003 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2009 09:48:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:48:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of greensight@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.178] (HELO mail-yx0-f178.google.com) (209.85.210.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:48:21 +0000 Received: by yxe8 with SMTP id 8so1441700yxe.9 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:48:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=y3jrM/70q3hrWdVWUA8tmwHJZSZ50tVL0WR302es2R4=; b=lDOZ8KX4tAXPzbwpBWDgpWDmh/EgItxXcRdqxiwH2zx7S2cjrpwTJ/nO9Z5NlOVMoG WU2EhmoofCKQtBGDiLjHYQWxp9BPtLegpOkSxm2d3M6479GUYw8v9u7WcCz3ucmFzhF4 EZxRrPF1FU+Qi2OwHOK/1KTLp0HbNmZEVGzug= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=rmN6rpYRoCav9WFj6LDxwxykZwIkJT9D7hio84ZjCMroBXyog35GrsTbv/WYy7jPZV RIhkTC8D9N3sVqc8gMW8nVEy0ZGwtlP+zwr/S4UIAwDiAR0YDo0gXJzGhuhOSGFUFlMF NiV7miOd4R0iOK8CTQFfjSgbQ9NnBeyoKB/E0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.149.20 with SMTP id b20mr3165323ybo.322.1245318480144; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:48:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5e7fd1eb0906170132j41822cc4nc952e902425823d3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:48:00 +0800 Message-ID: <5e7fd1eb0906180248p71a9956cif90c9197058bc5e3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Certify Geronimo with Harmony From: Jack Cai To: jcp-open@apache.org, niclas@hedhman.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517511b08a428ce046c9c4dd3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001517511b08a428ce046c9c4dd3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit That will be cool! On the other hand, passing the JEE TCK will demonstrate the maturity of Harmony. There are people who do not care whether something is labelled as "Java", but we all care about the code's maturity. -Jack 2009/6/18 Niclas Hedhman > We could introduce "Harmony Enterprise Edition", consisting of > Harmony+Geronimo, and not mention "Java" at all... ;-) > > Cheers > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Jack Cai wrote: > > As Apache will not get a JSE TCK in the near (long) future, some Harmony > > project members are looking > > back to the idea of certifying Geronimo with Harmony as a JEE-compliant > > server. Geronimo can now run > > happily with Harmony. We also did some free hand testing with a few > > applications running on this > > combination, such Roller, JSPWiki, JForum etc. Everything looks > promising! > > > > Does anybody see any legal problems with the above idea? Is it ever > possible > > to certify Geronimo with a > > non-certified JSE? > > > > Look forward to some advice! We want to get the ball rolling as soon as > > possible. Thanks! > > > > -Jack > > > > > > > > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java > > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug > --001517511b08a428ce046c9c4dd3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That will be cool!

On the other hand, passing the JEE TCK will demon= strate the maturity of Harmony. There are people who do not care whether so= mething is labelled as "Java", but we all care about the code'= ;s maturity.

-Jack

2009/6/18 Niclas Hedhman <hedhman@gmail.com&= gt;
We could introduce "Harmony Enterprise Edition", consisting of Harmony+Geronimo, and not mention "Java" at all... ;-)

Cheers

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Jack Cai<greensight@gmail.com> wrote:
> As Apache will not get a JSE TCK in the near (long) future, some Harmo= ny
> project members are looking
> back to the idea of certifying Geronimo with Harmony as a JEE-complian= t
> server. Geronimo can now run
> happily with Harmony. We also did some free hand testing with a few > applications running on this
> combination, such Roller, JSPWiki, JForum etc. Everything looks promis= ing!
>
> Does anybody see any legal problems with the above idea? Is it ever po= ssible
> to certify Geronimo with a
> non-certified JSE?
>
> Look forward to some advice! We want to get the ball rolling as soon a= s
> possible. Thanks!
>
> -Jack
>
>



--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org -= New Energy for Java

I =A0live here; htt= p://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I =A0work here; htt= p://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http:= //tinyurl.com/2cgsug

--001517511b08a428ce046c9c4dd3--