www-jcp-open mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: stubbed out implementations of jcp-managed interfaces
Date Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:50:39 GMT
I think you should just create interface and stub class jars.  You're  
not claiming its an impl or compatible.

geir

On Oct 26, 2007, at 1:44 PM, Rick Hillegas wrote:

> The following issue has come up on the Derby developer list and I  
> would like your advice about how to proceed:
>
> In order to build a releasable distribution of Derby, a developer  
> needs to compile Derby's small device support. Right now, this  
> involves finding an implementation of the CDC foundation classes  
> and the JSR 169 database interface classes--both of which  
> implementations are licensed under JCP rules. As far as I know, the  
> only implementations of these interfaces are available from  
> companies which require that you accept their additional,  
> encumbering licenses. Rather than sending every release manager out  
> on this hunt, I'd like to be able to check in enough Apache- 
> compatible machinery that the Derby build would always  
> automatically compile the small device support.
>
> One possibility would be to create our own stubbed out  
> implementation of the CDC foundation and JSR 169 classes. A  
> warning, however, has been raised. We are worried that the JCP  
> rules may not allow us to create a stubbed out implementation which  
> is only useful for compilation purposes. Is that also the opinion  
> of the jcp-open@apache.org list?
>
> I would appreciate your advice on how I can get my hands on  
> unencumbered compile-time machinery so that I can simplify the  
> Derby build.
>
> Thanks,
> -Rick


Mime
View raw message