www-jcp-open mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew C. Oliver" <acoli...@buni.org>
Subject Re: Looks like Sun responded to the Open Letter
Date Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:43:24 GMT
Danese Cooper wrote:
> So from my perspective its critical that ASF continue to hold Sun's 
> feet the to the fire for as long as Java isn't truly Open.
+1...but I don't think anyone disagrees there.  The disagreement is 
whether Apache continues to give credibility to a non-open 
organization.  It has been enough years to "call it". 

There are other means of actual action that could accomplish much the 
same thing.  If the big bully keeps beating you when you play in his 
sand box...what do you do? 


> Thanks for listening.
> Danese
> On Aug 12, 2007, at 10:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On 8/13/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>> Are we there yet... no, not at all. But we're
>>>> certainly headed in that direction and gaining
>>>> momentum.
>>> If this were not so, why would there be a .NET vm in the first place?
>>> What I found interesting was that MS focused on making this an ECMA
>>> spec, not a "Microsoft spec".  Perhaps they had already learned from
>>> simply watching the JCP?
>> I can't tell whether you are simply playing straight man, or whether
>> you are unaware of the history here.  In any case, those who weren't
>> aware of the history, here are two links:
>> http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/1999-05/sunflash.990506.1.xml
>> http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/1999-12/sunflash.991207.13.xml
>> - Sam Ruby

Buni Meldware Communication Suite
Multi-platform and extensible Email, 
Calendaring (including freebusy), 
Rich Webmail, Web-calendaring, ease 
of installation/administration.

View raw message