Mailing-List: contact jcp-open-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jcp-open@apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4695A47D.7080309@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:48:13 -0600
From: Jeff Genender <jgenender@apache.org>
Reply-To: jgenender@apache.org
Organization: Apache Geronimo
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Macintosh/20070604)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jcp-open@apache.org
Subject: Re: Real world example of TCK have's vs have-not's
References: <19e0530f0707110743r7ea9577n87a30154d7ff3ede@mail.gmail.com>
	 <2d12b2f00707111533q2b3241c1r246ebefb908460ae@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200707112216.11984.dkulp@apache.org>
 <19e0530f0707111919i43e10758jcec6f9c4e03a8829@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <19e0530f0707111919i43e10758jcec6f9c4e03a8829@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Yep...this is a perfect case-in-point where a central TCK/JCP authority
for would be helpful across projects.

Jeff

Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Not to mention cross project cooperation. Axis2 folks don't know
> what's happening inside the cxf jcp sandbox and geronimo jcp sandbox.
> Right now the only person who knows all 3 is Mr Jarek :) as he is
> committer on all 3 project *and* has access to both the J2EE and JAXWS
> TCK's :) :)
> 
> -- dims
> 
> On 7/11/07, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Well, this is a very particular case in that the test HAS been changed in
>> the latest version of the TCK.
>>
>> However, it shows another issue:  CXF did challenge the tests in
>> question, but were then "scolded" by Sun for not using the latest TCK.
>> However, we didn't know there was a newer TCK.    (GERONIMOTCK-36 for
>> those with access)
>>
>> In this case, not only do they not know about the newer TCK, but they
>> also didn't know we already tried challenging it.   Part of that is
>> because all the communications and stuff around the TCK has to be done
>> behind closed doors and on private lists and in private JIRA's and such.
>>
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday 11 July 2007 18:33, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> > All I'm seeing here is that someone is committing a fix based on a TCK
>> > test. Where's the have not?
>> >
>> > On 7/11/07, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > FWIW, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=555276
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>
>> -- 
>> J. Daniel Kulp
>> Principal Engineer
>> IONA
>> P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194
>> daniel.kulp@iona.com
>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>>
> 
>