Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jcp-open-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33857 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2007 22:47:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2007 22:47:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 13776 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2007 22:47:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jcp-open-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 13680 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2007 22:47:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jcp-open-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: jcp-open@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list jcp-open@apache.org Received: (qmail 13668 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2007 22:47:43 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:47:43 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.238] (HELO smtpout10.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.238) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:47:39 -0700 Received: (qmail 31411 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2007 22:47:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (24.15.193.17) by smtpout10-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.238) with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2007 22:47:17 -0000 Message-ID: <46955DF4.5070105@rowe-clan.net> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:47:16 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jcp-open@apache.org Subject: Re: Real world example of TCK have's vs have-not's References: <19e0530f0707110743r7ea9577n87a30154d7ff3ede@mail.gmail.com> <2d12b2f00707111533q2b3241c1r246ebefb908460ae@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2d12b2f00707111533q2b3241c1r246ebefb908460ae@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org AIUI - this test should be appealed, which means access to the TCK process (although the committer notes that there is a small efficiency to be gained, anyways.) Henri Yandell wrote: > All I'm seeing here is that someone is committing a fix based on a TCK > test. Where's the have not? > > On 7/11/07, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> FWIW, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=555276