Mailing list archives: July 2007

Site index · List index
Message list« Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: jcp-open Digest of: get.703_703 Wed, 04 Jul, 22:03
Rory Winston Re: jcp-open Digest of: get.703_703 Wed, 04 Jul, 22:10
Ralph Goers Re: jcp-open Digest of: get.703_703 Wed, 04 Jul, 22:42
Sam Ruby Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Wed, 04 Jul, 23:46
Jeff Genender Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Wed, 04 Jul, 23:51
Joe Schaefer Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Thu, 05 Jul, 02:00
Andrew C. Oliver Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Thu, 05 Jul, 04:39
Bill Barker Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Thu, 05 Jul, 04:49
Sam Ruby Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Thu, 05 Jul, 04:58
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: jcp-open Digest of: get.703_703 Thu, 05 Jul, 05:01
Bill Barker Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Thu, 05 Jul, 05:09
Sam Ruby Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Thu, 05 Jul, 05:12
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Thu, 05 Jul, 05:18
Bill Barker Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Thu, 05 Jul, 05:39
Craig McClanahan Re: jcp-open Digest of: get.703_703 Thu, 05 Jul, 05:58
Justin Erenkrantz Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Thu, 05 Jul, 06:34
Ralph Goers Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Thu, 05 Jul, 07:55
Ralph Goers Re: jcp-open Digest of: get.703_703 Thu, 05 Jul, 08:34
Bill Barker Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Thu, 05 Jul, 08:40
Ralph Goers Re: jcp-open Digest of: get.703_703 Thu, 05 Jul, 08:42
Martin van den Bemt Re: jcp-open Digest of: get.703_703 Thu, 05 Jul, 11:02
Martin van den Bemt Re: jcp-open Digest of: get.703_703 Thu, 05 Jul, 11:09
Henri Yandell Proposed policy going forward Thu, 05 Jul, 20:30
Roy T. Fielding Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Thu, 05 Jul, 20:55
robert burrell donkin Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Thu, 05 Jul, 21:21
Bill Stoddard Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Thu, 05 Jul, 21:25
Andrew C. Oliver Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Thu, 05 Jul, 21:28
Ralph Goers Re: jcp-open Digest of: get.703_703 Thu, 05 Jul, 22:21
William A. Rowe, Jr. Food for thought Fri, 06 Jul, 03:45
Ralph Goers Re: Food for thought Fri, 06 Jul, 07:45
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: Food for thought Fri, 06 Jul, 08:21
Ralph Goers Re: Food for thought Fri, 06 Jul, 08:26
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: Food for thought Fri, 06 Jul, 09:09
Matthias Wessendorf Re: JSR 314: JavaServer Faces 2.0 Fri, 06 Jul, 09:16
Sam Ruby Re: Food for thought Fri, 06 Jul, 14:29
Gary VanMatre Re: JSR 314: JavaServer Faces 2.0 Fri, 06 Jul, 14:42
Matt Hogstrom [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 15:34
Davanum Srinivas Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 15:44
Matt Hogstrom Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 15:51
Davanum Srinivas Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 15:53
Sam Ruby Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 15:57
Matt Hogstrom Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 16:07
Andrew C. Oliver Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 16:43
Bertrand Delacretaz Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 16:52
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: Food for thought Fri, 06 Jul, 16:55
Jim Jagielski Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 17:07
Filip at Apache Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 17:33
Roland Weber Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 17:45
Jim Jagielski Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 17:53
Roland Weber Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 18:28
Jeff Genender Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 18:28
Justin Erenkrantz Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 18:33
Roland Weber Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 18:40
Jeff Genender Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 18:43
Davanum Srinivas Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 18:46
Andrew C. Oliver Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round Fri, 06 Jul, 18:48
Justin Erenkrantz Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 18:52
Jeff Genender Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round Fri, 06 Jul, 18:58
Jeff Genender Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 18:58
Gary VanMatre Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 19:09
Andrew C. Oliver Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round Fri, 06 Jul, 19:18
David Jencks Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 19:24
Jeff Genender Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round Fri, 06 Jul, 19:25
Jeff Genender Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 19:33
Andrew C. Oliver Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round Fri, 06 Jul, 19:41
Joe Schaefer Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 19:41
Jeff Genender Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round Fri, 06 Jul, 19:52
Jeff Genender Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 19:54
Ralph Goers Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 19:54
Andrew C. Oliver Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round Fri, 06 Jul, 19:57
Ralph Goers Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 19:58
Ralph Goers Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round Fri, 06 Jul, 20:03
Jeff Genender Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round Fri, 06 Jul, 20:09
Ralph Goers Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round Fri, 06 Jul, 20:14
Roland Weber Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 20:24
Jeff Genender Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round Fri, 06 Jul, 20:25
Jeff Genender Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2 Fri, 06 Jul, 20:31
Roy T. Fielding Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Fri, 06 Jul, 20:35
Ralph Goers Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round Fri, 06 Jul, 20:37
Roy T. Fielding Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Fri, 06 Jul, 20:39
Geir Magnusson Jr. Re: servlet 3.0 (JSR-315) Fri, 06 Jul, 20:43
Geir Magnusson Jr. Re: No NDAs? Or open TCKs? Fri, 06 Jul, 20:55
Geir Magnusson Jr. Re: [VOTE] New ASF/JCP Policies Fri, 06 Jul, 20:56
Andrew C. Oliver Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round Fri, 06 Jul, 20:56
Geir Magnusson Jr. Re: [Draft] New ASF/JCP Policies Fri, 06 Jul, 20:58
Craig L Russell Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Fri, 06 Jul, 20:58
Geir Magnusson Jr. Re: Polls vs Votes (was Re: [VOTE] New ASF/JCP Policies) Fri, 06 Jul, 21:03
Geir Magnusson Jr. Re: JSR 316: Java Platform, Enterprise Edition 6 Specification Fri, 06 Jul, 21:04
Jeff Genender Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round Fri, 06 Jul, 21:05
Roy T. Fielding Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Fri, 06 Jul, 21:08
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: [VOTE] New ASF/JCP Policies Fri, 06 Jul, 21:09
Geir Magnusson Jr. Re: JSR 316: Java Platform, Enterprise Edition 6 Specification Fri, 06 Jul, 21:09
Geir Magnusson Jr. Re: JSR 316: Java Platform, Enterprise Edition 6 Specification Fri, 06 Jul, 21:10
Geir Magnusson Jr. Re: JSR 316: Java Platform, Enterprise Edition 6 Specification Fri, 06 Jul, 21:11
Geir Magnusson Jr. Re: No NDAs? Or open TCKs? Fri, 06 Jul, 21:13
Geir Magnusson Jr. Re: jcp-open Digest of: get.703_703 Fri, 06 Jul, 21:18
Geir Magnusson Jr. Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Fri, 06 Jul, 21:24
Geir Magnusson Jr. Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Fri, 06 Jul, 21:25
Geir Magnusson Jr. Re: Are proprietary TCK's compatible with open standards? Fri, 06 Jul, 21:27
Geir Magnusson Jr. Re: jcp-open Digest of: get.703_703 Fri, 06 Jul, 21:29
Message list« Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Dec 20096
Nov 20095
Oct 20096
Sep 20093
Aug 200912
Jul 200916
Jun 200934
May 20096
Apr 200914
Mar 200927
Feb 200918
Jan 200915
Dec 200822
Nov 200823
Oct 20087
Sep 20089
Aug 20082
Jun 20084
May 20081
Apr 20084
Mar 200838
Feb 20087
Jan 200829
Dec 200710
Nov 20073
Oct 200722
Sep 200718
Aug 2007183
Jul 2007603
Jun 200768
May 2007111
Apr 20072
Mar 200733
Feb 200754
Jan 200773
Nov 20061
Oct 20065
Sep 200627
Aug 200625
Jul 200624
Jun 200622
May 200611
Apr 200618
Mar 200657
Feb 200632
Jan 200653
Dec 200567
Nov 200526
Jun 20051
Jan 20045
Apr 20032