www-jcp-open mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@iq80.com>
Subject Re: Why require an opensource RI?
Date Wed, 04 Jul 2007 05:44:05 GMT
In that case we would only need binary redistribution rights which  
could be FOU restricted to TCK testing.

-dain

On Jul 3, 2007, at 8:05 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> For TCK there are tests (at least for J2EE / Java EE) for interop  
> that validates correctness.  In that case it makes sense.  Not sure  
> about the other TCKs.
>
> On Jul 3, 2007, at 3:19 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
>> Sam,
>>
>> In your proposed changes to the JCP policy you added:
>>
>> "License their Reference Implementations (RIs) and Technology  
>> Compatibility Kits (TCKs) in a manner that neither requires an NDA  
>> for access, nor imposes restrictions that would preclude  
>> implementation of the original JSR under open source licenses. In  
>> particular, the license for the TCK may not impose FOU  
>> requirements on implementations."
>>
>> I'm curious why we care about the license for anyone else's  
>> implementation of a JSR even if it is the "Reference Implementation"?
>>
>> -dain
>>
>


Mime
View raw message