www-jcp-open mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: servlet 3.0 (JSR-315)
Date Tue, 03 Jul 2007 02:07:29 GMT

On Jul 2, 2007, at 9:18 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:

> "Geir Magnusson Jr." <geir@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> On Jul 2, 2007, at 7:19 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>
>>> "Geir Magnusson Jr." <geir@pobox.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> This clearly isn't one of our finest moments.  It's apparent to me
>>>> that the group wants to avoid voting yes, and is searching for a
>>>> reason.  We had a lot of +1s for reasons that even sam seems to  
>>>> have
>>>> backed away from, and we aren't going to go with the hard-line  
>>>> reason
>>>> that actually makes logical sense to me. I gave you my best  
>>>> advice  on
>>>> what to do, but didn't get very far.
>>>
>>> That's because this isn't how decisions are made at Apache, Geir.
>>
>> It was today, Joe.
>
> It sounds to me, based on what you've written, like the "hard-line
> reason that actually makes logical sense", i.e. "no", is what you
> would've liked to have done.  If that's really the best choice in
> your view, what's stopping you from changing the vote to that?

Chess is a much more interesting game when you get to publicly  
explain your strategy to your opponent before attempting to execute  
on it...

I think that a "no" vote for this reason should be coordinated for  
maximum impact, at least to start.

geir


>
> -- 
> Joe Schaefer


Mime
View raw message