www-jcp-open mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Real world example of TCK have's vs have-not's
Date Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:41:01 GMT
I agree. And it sounds like Geir's understanding of the TCK NDA would  
solve this issue (assuming that the spec lead agreed with Geir's  
interpretation). Is Sun the spec lead here?


On Jul 11, 2007, at 4:25 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

> I think this is a classic example.  The community has the choice to  
> change the implementation, challenge the test, or both.  Which path  
> to pick isn't clean and needs to be discussed and only the NDA  
> signers can be involved in the discussion.  You can argue that it  
> is an easy decision in this case (which may be the case), but in my  
> opinion, the larger community should be able to participate.
> -dain
> On Jul 11, 2007, at 3:47 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> AIUI - this test should be appealed, which means access to the TCK  
>> process
>> (although the committer notes that there is a small efficiency to  
>> be gained,
>> anyways.)
>> Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> All I'm seeing here is that someone is committing a fix based on  
>>> a TCK
>>> test. Where's the have not?
>>> On 7/11/07, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> FWIW, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=555276

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

View raw message