www-jcp-open mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Genender <jgenen...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Real world example of TCK have's vs have-not's
Date Thu, 12 Jul 2007 03:48:13 GMT
Yep...this is a perfect case-in-point where a central TCK/JCP authority
for would be helpful across projects.

Jeff

Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Not to mention cross project cooperation. Axis2 folks don't know
> what's happening inside the cxf jcp sandbox and geronimo jcp sandbox.
> Right now the only person who knows all 3 is Mr Jarek :) as he is
> committer on all 3 project *and* has access to both the J2EE and JAXWS
> TCK's :) :)
> 
> -- dims
> 
> On 7/11/07, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Well, this is a very particular case in that the test HAS been changed in
>> the latest version of the TCK.
>>
>> However, it shows another issue:  CXF did challenge the tests in
>> question, but were then "scolded" by Sun for not using the latest TCK.
>> However, we didn't know there was a newer TCK.    (GERONIMOTCK-36 for
>> those with access)
>>
>> In this case, not only do they not know about the newer TCK, but they
>> also didn't know we already tried challenging it.   Part of that is
>> because all the communications and stuff around the TCK has to be done
>> behind closed doors and on private lists and in private JIRA's and such.
>>
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday 11 July 2007 18:33, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> > All I'm seeing here is that someone is committing a fix based on a TCK
>> > test. Where's the have not?
>> >
>> > On 7/11/07, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > FWIW, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=555276
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>
>> -- 
>> J. Daniel Kulp
>> Principal Engineer
>> IONA
>> P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194
>> daniel.kulp@iona.com
>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>>
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message