www-jcp-open mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <m...@hogstrom.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2
Date Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:51:41 GMT

On Jul 6, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:

> Matt,
> What should Apache do in this case? Oppose the JSR? Vote No? or just
> not participate in the JSR?
> "In addition to JSR specifications, the TCK used to validate the JSR
> must also be available under a license that does not incur downstream
> implications to users of the implementation or the code used to
> implement it. Also, the license used to obtain the TCK cannot include
> terms that would restrict open communication and use of the TCK to
> validate an implmentation."

I would expect we vote no with stated objections pointing back to  
this policy.

View raw message