www-jcp-open mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: No NDAs? Or open TCKs?
Date Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:13:50 GMT
There is no binary for OpenJDK.

Work out the details yourself :)

geir

On Jul 4, 2007, at 1:48 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

> On Jul 3, 2007, at 9:00 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
>> Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> writes:
>>
>>> On Jul 3, 2007, at 5:06 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>>>
>>>     *This* disagreement with Sun is about a company that accepted  
>>> our
>>>     help and intellectual property based on an agreed set of  
>>> terms and
>>>     then broke that agreement at the last minute for pure profit  
>>> reasons.
>>>
>>> I've heard this comment a few times.  Did Sun specifically state  
>>> that
>>> they would remove the FOU restrictions for the JCK when licensing to
>>> Apache?  If so, is it in a form we can use publicly as that in  
>>> and of
>>> itself is pretty damaging.
>>
>> Read the board minutes.  The first license they offered us for  
>> harmony
>> had no FOU restrictions.
>
> Also as Andy pointed out, the Sun owned OpenJDK has no FOU  
> restrictions, so they not playing fair.  This is an obvious double  
> standard and something we should all blog about.
>
> -dain


Mime
View raw message