www-jcp-open mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Davanum Srinivas" <dava...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Real world example of TCK have's vs have-not's
Date Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:19:42 GMT
Not to mention cross project cooperation. Axis2 folks don't know
what's happening inside the cxf jcp sandbox and geronimo jcp sandbox.
Right now the only person who knows all 3 is Mr Jarek :) as he is
committer on all 3 project *and* has access to both the J2EE and JAXWS
TCK's :) :)

-- dims

On 7/11/07, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Well, this is a very particular case in that the test HAS been changed in
> the latest version of the TCK.
>
> However, it shows another issue:  CXF did challenge the tests in
> question, but were then "scolded" by Sun for not using the latest TCK.
> However, we didn't know there was a newer TCK.    (GERONIMOTCK-36 for
> those with access)
>
> In this case, not only do they not know about the newer TCK, but they
> also didn't know we already tried challenging it.   Part of that is
> because all the communications and stuff around the TCK has to be done
> behind closed doors and on private lists and in private JIRA's and such.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Wednesday 11 July 2007 18:33, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > All I'm seeing here is that someone is committing a fix based on a TCK
> > test. Where's the have not?
> >
> > On 7/11/07, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > FWIW, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=555276
> > >
> > > --
> > > Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> IONA
> P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194
> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>


-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com

Mime
View raw message