www-jcp-open mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Davanum Srinivas" <dava...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Real world example of TCK have's vs have-not's
Date Thu, 12 Jul 2007 01:21:39 GMT
Yep!! Thanks Dain.

On 7/11/07, Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com> wrote:
> I think this is a classic example.  The community has the choice to
> change the implementation, challenge the test, or both.  Which path
> to pick isn't clean and needs to be discussed and only the NDA
> signers can be involved in the discussion.  You can argue that it is
> an easy decision in this case (which may be the case), but in my
> opinion, the larger community should be able to participate.
>
> -dain
>
> On Jul 11, 2007, at 3:47 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > AIUI - this test should be appealed, which means access to the TCK
> > process
> > (although the committer notes that there is a small efficiency to
> > be gained,
> > anyways.)
> >
> > Henri Yandell wrote:
> >> All I'm seeing here is that someone is committing a fix based on a
> >> TCK
> >> test. Where's the have not?
> >>
> >> On 7/11/07, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> FWIW, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=555276
> >
>
>


-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com

Mime
View raw message