www-jcp-open mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From gvanma...@comcast.net (Gary VanMatre)
Subject Re: [DISCUSS} Alternate Proposed Changes to JCP Participation - Round 2
Date Fri, 06 Jul 2007 19:09:01 GMT
>From: Jeff Genender <jgenender@apache.org> 
> I really don't like the "vote against" component. IMHO, that is 
> disruptive and will give us an interesting reputation. I would 
> recommend we simply pull out of JSRs that don't play by the rules. 
> I just wouldn't participate, not be a road block. 

I agree.  One thing that I've learned from hanging around at Apache is that there are allot
of experts out there - many are not even committers here.  I doubt that the JSR leads will
give us a second glance if we stick our noses in the air declaring that we are starbelly sneetches.

> My .02. 
> Jeff 


> Matt Hogstrom wrote: 
> > Sam had challenged us to put our thinking into a form that people could 
> > shoot at. I've thought about this for a bit and have an alternate set 
> > of changes for participation at the JCP. I have marked up a copy fo the 
> > JCP page and submit this for your consideration. Although I may have 
> > left some holes I believe that this change in policy strikes a balance 
> > of communicating our position going forward without jeopardizing 
> > commitments already made in the past. 
> > 
> > http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/jcp/ 
View raw message