Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jcp-open-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 12552 invoked from network); 28 May 2007 19:20:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 May 2007 19:20:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 95547 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2007 19:20:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jcp-open-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 95449 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2007 19:20:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jcp-open-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: jcp-open@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list jcp-open@apache.org Received: (qmail 95440 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2007 19:20:07 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 May 2007 12:20:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.248 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.248] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.248) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 May 2007 12:20:01 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c28so488562ana for ; Mon, 28 May 2007 12:19:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rr4/B1v6x5Tt58SDups6NNIRA2ePKUNL8fUxMyWmVmMoKwIe3b9AUWWkOGHs+dSXNTMPBdpyuO81MV4AzsSu+emrZP+dtK6vjDn9pqDWtpTm3S2eYys9fyAFpPuxGfE/hO3PKmx/p5ZjW6OXLsIm0MbrKyZycySa7frsduDA5Kg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=U7oaGsUizqEWxg94jExLqlyFQ2NoGlhdtKZvnyGgyoonr4FCeo61Nq3Lg14t4kHFjBsm42iIQw/3F1Ugp43BBKSFLMpmIuWCBiLiZkXmPO9kjzrHXZ2k58LhGV7zf61GiZOdq/la1OIAKVktwcgQ/eiu+FupSar25+08WM9AQbU= Received: by 10.143.156.6 with SMTP id i6mr180372wfo.1180379971187; Mon, 28 May 2007 12:19:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.8.19 with HTTP; Mon, 28 May 2007 12:19:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 20:19:31 +0100 From: "robert burrell donkin" To: jcp-open@apache.org Subject: Re: EJB 3.1 and JavaEE6 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <612F936A-52E0-4E75-9177-937526D22FBA@visi.com> <8FAB878A-8349-4FB0-BD3B-CADB28587290@pobox.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 5/28/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > On May 28, 2007, at 3:12 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > > On 5/28/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > >> note that Jeff Genender also wishes to participate, at least on > >> JavaEE6 IIRC. You two should sync up on this (here) > > > > does the JCP has an issue with multiple expert having connections to a > > single organization? > > No - it's left up to the spec lead. what is the difference (in JCP terms) between being a representative for apache and an expert? is there any advantage for an expert who is an apache committer representing apache rather than being an independent? - robert