Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jcp-open-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27018 invoked from network); 25 May 2007 18:53:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 May 2007 18:53:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 77543 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2007 18:53:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jcp-open-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 77470 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2007 18:53:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jcp-open-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: jcp-open@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list jcp-open@apache.org Received: (qmail 77461 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2007 18:53:34 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 11:53:34 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of david.blevins@visi.com designates 208.42.156.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [208.42.156.2] (HELO conn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com) (208.42.156.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 11:53:28 -0700 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (cpe-76-167-141-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.167.141.63]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by conn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD058489 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 13:53:06 -0500 (CDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <612F936A-52E0-4E75-9177-937526D22FBA@visi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: jcp-open@apache.org From: David Blevins Subject: EJB 3.1 and JavaEE6 Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:53:05 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey all. I'd like to participate in EJB 3.1 and JavaEE6 as an Apache rep on those specs. Shooting a note out here for discussion. I was fortunate enough to participate in EJB 3.0 as an independent, but no longer have independent status. My motivation for continued participation in the EJB spec is obvious (OpenEJB) and these days about half of what one things of in EJB is actually defined by the JavaEE6 spec (injection, naming, much of the xml schema, packaging, etc). -David