www-jcp-open mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bruce Snyder" <bruce.sny...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JSR 291 - public review
Date Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:31:35 GMT
On 1/21/07, Niclas Hedhman <niclas@hedhman.org> wrote:
> On 1/22/07, Bruce Snyder <bruce.snyder@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm not sure I'm in favor of it either, even though I'm on the EG. My
> > intention was never to just rubber stamp the OSGi spec,
> Then your job is to speak up... ;o)
> > as I think
> > that the OSGi has no place in the JSE.
> What? I can only interpret this mean 2 things. Either;
>  1. You think OSGi should not be deployed on Java SE.
>  2. You think OSGi should not be shipped with the JDK.
> I assume you mean the second one, as the first one is hilariously silly...

Yes, number two is what I meant.

> Well, IMHO, the JDK is over bloated since long, and the main focus
> around release 1,2/1.3 should have been something like what we now see
> in the JSR-277, allowing for simple extensions of the runtime
> platform.


> Now, that said; Please take a look at the 300 or so JSRs so far, and
> see how many is or will be shipping in either the JDK or is part of
> the non-optional Java EE specification set.


perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"

Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
Castor - http://castor.org/

View raw message