Mailing-List: contact jcp-open-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jcp-open@apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <44616548.6080507@envoisolutions.com>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:00:08 -0400
From: Dan Diephouse <dan@envoisolutions.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jcp-open@apache.org
Subject: Re: jsr 261 and 265
References: <4460E880.1090803@envoisolutions.com>
 <4460FAE9.6080209@apache.org> <4461063D.9040501@envoisolutions.com>
In-Reply-To: <4461063D.9040501@envoisolutions.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Can someone confirm that I need to fax the NDA to the fax # on the 
contact page? (http://apache.org/foundation/contact.html) - the Apache 
JCP site doesn't have a # listed.

- Dan

Dan Diephouse wrote:
> I need to get the NDA in to Apache yet. Other than that though whats 
> the official process for joining up? Do I just use the normal JSR form?
>
> http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/egnom?id=265
>
> - Dan
>
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> sure - no reason why not.  I'll go ping the PMO and tell them you are 
>> coming.
>>
>> geir
>>
>> Dan Diephouse wrote:
>>> Is there any chance that I could represent Apache for JSR-265 
>>> (ws-policy) and JSR-261 (ws-addressing)? I would like to push for 
>>> Apache agenda (free TCKs, etc) and also try to push the spec in a 
>>> direction that is coherent with JBI, JAX-WS (jsr-261), JAX-WSA, etc. 
>>> I believe they will be quite important to ServiceMix in the future. 
>>> AFAIK there is no one else on these specs.
>>> - Dan
>>>
>
>


-- 
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com
http://netzooid.com/blog