www-jcp-open mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Felipe Leme <felip...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: EJB3 vote
Date Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:24:34 GMT
Hi again Geir,

Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> When this mess was created two years ago, Sun as the spec lead promised 
> that there would be a separate TCK for JPA.  While I was against the 

Just for the record, that promise is officially stated in the "A Letter 
to the Java Technology Community" 

"The new POJO persistence model will be delivered by JSR-220 as a 
separate specification, Reference Implementation, and Technology 
Compatibility Kit, usable independently of EJB 3.0."

And that's not all: they also "believe this is a unique opportunity for 
the Java community to create a common POJO persistence model for both 
J2SE and J2EE" and "ask the entire Java technology community to support 
us and the efforts of the JSR-220 Expert Group".

So, I'd say they asked and we supported it; now it's their time to keep 
the promisse and deliver a separate spec, RI and TCK.

-- Felipe

View raw message